Vertical video uploads grew another 24% this year. A stats page where every number links to its primary source, because most short-form statistics online just recycle each other.

Vertical HD (1080x1920) video uploads grew 24% year over year, per Wistia's 2026 State of Video Report, which analyzed over 13 million videos and 79 million hours of viewing data. In the same dataset, 4K uploads rose 16%, while 720p uploads fell 8% and square videos declined 4%. The format war is over: vertical won, and it is still gaining.
I collect stats pages like this one with some skepticism, because most "short-form video statistics 2026" articles recycle each other's numbers until nobody remembers the source or the year. So here is the version I wanted to find: only numbers I could verify on a primary source page, each one linked, with the methodology named. If a stat is not here, I could not trace it.
| Statistic | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical HD upload growth, YoY | +24% | Wistia 2026 (13M videos) |
| Average Reel watch time | 8.5 seconds (2x YoY) | Metricool 2026 (24.4M posts) |
| Reels publishing growth, YoY | +35% | Metricool 2026 |
| Reels vs single-image interactions | more than 4x | Metricool 2026 |
| TikTok median engagement rate | 2.01%, highest platform | Quid 2026 report |
| Marketers using Instagram | 82%, more than any platform | Metricool 2026 |
| Teams publishing at least monthly | 76% | Wistia 2026 |
The Wistia figures are from the sixth annual State of Video Report; the full report sits behind a form, but Wistia publishes the key numbers ungated on their video marketing statistics page, which is what I link and verified against. The Metricool figures are from their 2026 Instagram Study, 24,364,803 posts from 375,118 accounts. The engagement medians are from the 2026 Social Media Industry Benchmark Report by Quid, formerly Rival IQ.
One methodology note that applies to every annual report on this page: a "2026 report" measures the previous full cycle. Wistia's 2026 edition published in April 2026, Quid's in March 2026, both on data through 2025. That is normal, but worth carrying with the citation.
From the same Wistia dataset: 81% of teams share videos on LinkedIn, closely followed by YouTube at 76%. For short clips specifically, LinkedIn again leads at 67%, then Instagram (49%), YouTube (41%), and Facebook (34%), and 60% of teams use those clips to drive traffic back to their own site. Meanwhile 76% of teams adjust the aspect ratio depending on where they post, half of them every time.
Two things stand out in that list. Short-form is no longer a consumer-platform phenomenon, LinkedIn leading clip distribution means B2B fully adopted the format. And the aspect-ratio number quietly confirms the headline stat: teams now shoot for vertical first and adapt outward.
Supply is growing faster than attention. Reels publishing rose 35% in a year while Instagram's median engagement rate fell roughly 17% (to 0.30%, per Quid); TikTok stays the engagement leader at a 2.01% median but declined too. And the average Reel holds a viewer for 8.5 seconds, double last year yet still a fraction of a typical video's length.
I keep the platform-by-platform breakdowns separate: the 2026 engagement benchmarks hub, the Reels-specific numbers, and the length data.
Every stat on this page says the same thing from a different angle: distribution is abundant, attention is the scarcity.
The format decision is settled, vertical, short, platform-native, so the numbers above will not differentiate anyone in 2026. Everyone has the same statistics and the same playbook. What the averages hide is the only thing left to compete on: whether your specific video holds attention in its specific first seconds.
That is not knowable from a stats page, and it is not knowable from your own rewatching either. It is knowable from real viewers. Jeena puts your video in front of real people on their phones with the front camera on, before you post, and shows you the frame-by-frame attention heatmap, the visibility map of what nobody saw, and the moments that earned a reaction. The industry numbers tell you the game; the attention data tells you how your player is doing. Here is how that differs from analytics.
Upload your video to Jeena before you post it. Real viewers watch it on their phones with the front camera on, and the report shows where their eyes went frame by frame, what held them past the average, and what would have lost them, with three concrete recommendations.
No "schedule a call." No sales rep. Upload, get your report.
Yes, on the supply side dramatically: vertical HD uploads grew 24% year over year (Wistia's 2026 State of Video Report, 13 million videos analyzed) and Reels publishing grew 35% (Metricool's 2026 Instagram Study). Engagement per post is falling at the same time, because supply is growing faster than attention: Instagram's median engagement dropped roughly 17% in the same period.
For marketing teams, LinkedIn: 81% of teams share videos there and 67% share short clips there, ahead of Instagram (49%), YouTube (41%), and Facebook (34%), per Wistia's 2026 data. Among social platforms overall, 82% of social media professionals use Instagram for marketing, more than any other platform, per Metricool's 2026 study.
The average Instagram Reel holds a viewer for 8.5 seconds, per Metricool's 2026 Instagram Study of 24.4 million posts, more than double the previous year but still far below typical video length. Practically, most viewers only ever experience the opening stretch of a short video, which is why the first seconds decide most of its performance.
Jeena is a neuromarketing platform for short-form video. Real people watch your video on their phone with the front camera on. Jeena captures their gaze direction, blink rate, eyebrow raises, and their impressions of the video in a short survey afterward. You receive an AI-powered report with an attention heatmap, a visibility map, a wow-moments chart, a summary of how viewers perceived the video, and three specific recommendations for making the video work harder.
Jeena uses smartphone front-camera gaze tracking. Each engager calibrates once, then watches your video. The platform records where their gaze lands frame by frame, flags moments of surprise from facial expression, and combines that with a short impressions survey afterward. The result is a per-second timeline of what real viewers actually looked at and felt, plus a summary of how they perceived the video overall.
A typical test costs around ten euros. See the pricing page for current rates.